Greenpeace Australia v Woodside Energy
COURT OR TRIBUNAL
Federal Court of Australia
DATE FILED (OR FIRST HEARING DATE)
13/12/2023
LITIGATION TYPE
Corporate Accountability
SUBJECT MATTER
Misleading and deceptive conduct
REVIEW TYPE
N/A
SUMMARY
Media release: “Greenpeace Australia Pacific alleges that the fossil fuel giant has been misrepresenting its climate performance and plans. Greenpeace Australia Pacific, represented by the Environmental Defenders Office (EDO), will claim that: (1) Woodside represented that it had cut the climate pollution from extracting and processing its gas and oil by 11% in 2022, but it had relied heavily on so-called “carbon offsets” – and its actual emissions went up by more than 3%. (2) Woodside represented that it had a plan to be ‘net zero’ by 2050, but it had neglected to mention that this didn’t apply to the emissions produced when its oil and gas gets burnt that represents over 90% of its climate pollution.”
CASE DOCUMENTS
RELATED CASES
JUMP TO CASE: